14 results for 'judge:"Price"'.
J. Price finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant for child molestation and incest against his daughter. Defendant argues that his daughter was improperly found competent to testify and that she made hearsay statements on the record. The lower court followed all the proper procedures in allowing a child to testify on such a serious issue and showed real thought in considering what was "reasonable to expect for a 6-year-old’s memory." Affirmed.
Court: Washington Court Of Appeals, Judge: Price, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 57808-5-II, Categories: Sex Offender, Witnesses, Child Victims
J. Price partially grants the media conglomerate's motion to compel discovery and award sanctions against the online retailers. A discovery deadline is extended, since the individual defendants are currently out of the country on a vacation and have yet to sit for depositions. Any such depositions conducted in this extended period, however, will be unavailable for summary judgment purposes. A request for sanctions is denied. Various objections raised by the defendants to the discovery requests are overruled.
Court: USDC Middle District of Florida, Judge: Price, Filed On: February 14, 2024, Case #: 6:22cv2417, NOS: Copyrights - Property Rights, Categories: Copyright, Discovery
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Price finds that the lower court properly ruled in favor of the University of Washington when a land developer sued them after being passed up for a development deal. The developer says the university used an unfair bidding process that resulted in the developer's competitor being selected for the building project instead, and says the university should have used a competitive bidding procedure to make its choice. There is nothing in law or in the record that required the university to follow a strict bidding process and it had the legal discretion to select the developer's competitor. Affirmed.
Court: Washington Court Of Appeals, Judge: Price, Filed On: December 5, 2023, Case #: 57985-5-II, Categories: Property, Contract